Comparison

Fire vs OpenRouter

Both put many providers behind one key and neither stores your prompts unless you ask. The differences are in what comes back with each call, what else the key can do, and how big the catalog is. This page says where OpenRouter is the better fit as plainly as where Fire is.

Side by side

What each one does with your call.

OpenRouter facts are taken from its own data-collection documentation; everything in the Fire column is verifiable in /v1/capabilities and the docs.

DimensionFireOpenRouter
Prompt storage by defaultNone. Metadata only (model, tokens, price, call_id).None. Prompt retention is always opt-in.
Opt-in loggingprivate (your dashboard, retention you choose) or improve (lets Fire use inputs/outputs to improve Fire). No discount for sharing.Private input/output logging, or "use of inputs/outputs" in exchange for a 1% discount on model usage.
Per-call withholdX-Fire-Content-Logging: off header on any call.Not documented in the source cited.
Upstream retention controlNot a routing filter today.Can restrict routing to zero-data-retention endpoints, globally or per request.
Price returned with the callYes — meta.price.usd is the exact charged amount on every response.Usage and cost are available; see OpenRouter's docs for how.
Catalog size53 models, 19 providers — every one live-tested on onboarding and re-audited weekly.Far larger. The better choice for the long tail.
Beyond chatImages (flat per-image price), image edit & upscale, text-to-speech, transcription, decision models — same key.Primarily a chat-completions gateway.
Multi-agent orchestration/v2/flows: DAGs of named agents, parallel branches, repeat macros, human-gate steps; queued and billed per step.Not a gateway feature.
Feedback on a callPOST /v1/calls/{call_id}/report and /rate; ratings feed public rankings with sample counts.—
Third-party credentialsVault broker: Fire injects the credential server-side; the agent never holds a key.—
Service discoveryPublic, machine-readable GET /v1/capabilities (AIGCSEP, covenant_level 0).Model list API.
BillingPrepaid credit packs from $5; published per-model text rates; cost-plus partner tier with disclosed markup.Prepaid credits.

Last reviewed October 2026. If something in the OpenRouter column is out of date, tell us and we will fix it — the point of the page is to be right.

◎

Choose OpenRouter when…

You need the widest possible model list, including niche and community-hosted models; you want to route only to zero-data-retention endpoints; or your workload is chat completions and nothing else.

▲

Choose Fire when…

You want images, speech, transcription and decisions on the same key as chat; you need the exact charged price in every response; you are building multi-step agents with human review; or you want a catalog where "listed" means "tested this week".

Privacy, concretely

Same default, different trade.

Both gateways discard content unless you opt in. OpenRouter's opt-in to product use comes with a 1% discount. Fire's improve mode has no price attached: the data is used to evaluate and route models better, is never sold or shared, and can be switched off — with a retention window you set — from the portal at any time.

Every Fire response reports which happened: meta.content_logged is true or false, so an agent can prove to its own user what was kept.

Fire's data policy →
# opted-in account, one sensitive call
curl -X POST https://fire.prosaga.net/v1/chat \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $FIRE_API_KEY" \
  -H "X-Fire-Content-Logging: off" \
  -d '{"messages":[{"role":"user","content":"…"}]}'

# → "meta": { "price": {"usd": 0.00033},
# "call_id": "c51e…",
# "content_logged": false }
Questions

People comparing the two ask

Does Fire store my prompts by default?

No. Fire logs call metadata — model, tokens, price, duration, call_id — on every call, and discards prompt and response content unless the account opts in to private or improve logging. OpenRouter likewise stores no prompts unless you opt in, per its data-collection documentation.

Does Fire give a discount for sharing my data?

No. OpenRouter offers a 1% discount for letting it use your inputs and outputs. Fire's improve mode is a plain opt-in with no price change — we would rather the choice be about trust than a percentage.

Which has more models?

OpenRouter, by a wide margin. Fire lists 53 models across 19 providers, every one of which has passed a live onboarding checklist and is re-audited weekly. If you need the long tail, OpenRouter is the larger catalog.

Can I restrict Fire to zero-data-retention providers?

Not as a routing switch. OpenRouter lets you route only to endpoints with a zero-data-retention policy. Fire controls what Fire keeps (opt-in content, retention window, per-call override) but does not currently expose upstream retention as a routing filter.

What does Fire do that OpenRouter doesn't?

Speech, transcription, decision models and queued multi-agent flows with human gates on the same key; a flat per-image price; the exact charged price returned on every call; call IDs you can report or rate; a vault broker for third-party credentials; and an AIGCSEP-style public capabilities document.

A raised hand holding a burning torch — the Fire brand emblem
Ready when you are

Run the same prompt through both. Keep the one that fits.

A Fire account is free and the first key takes a minute. Pay only when you top up.